What’s Wrong with the World

The men signed of the cross of Christ go gaily in the dark.

About

What’s Wrong with the World is dedicated to the defense of what remains of Christendom, the civilization made by the men of the Cross of Christ. Athwart two hostile Powers we stand: the Jihad and Liberalism...read more

Ten Years of What's Wrong with the World

Ten years ago, when I was a much younger man, What’s Wrong with the World appealed to me as an editor because it was ecumenical. That is to say, we all agreed on the core doctrines of Christianity (let us say, for simplicity, the Apostles Creed) while preserving without apology our differences in detail. Meanwhile, the keystone of our firm unity lay in our opposition: to the liberal spirit of the age, which among other outrages exposes our most vulnerable people to extra-legal execution, and denies the clear facts of mammalian biology; and to the marching might of the Islamic religion, with its endorsement of assassination, treachery and terror in the service of God.

Of those ten years it is difficult to compose a summary. Things have changed.

We are conservatives who kind of miss the dignity that Barack Obama displayed in the White House; we are Catholics who look askance at the Pope; we are Americans who wonder just what all the fuss over the “war on terror” was about, when simply stating the details of Islamic doctrine on war and subjugation is borderline illegal.

But I state this emphatically: it is not our hatred that animates us, though we do hate the devil and all his works. No: It’s our gratitude.

We are grateful for our country, for the liberty of our churches, for our friendships, our cities and towns and companies, our prosperity and legal right to the capital we earn by the sweat of our brows; more broadly we are grateful for our solidarity in these trying times with Americans of all walks across this wide land. We stand for the National Anthem but have some sympathy with men who, in good conscience, cannot.

We are a corporation of writers, grateful that we may write freely, and by our words fight against pernicious and servile ideas; we fight against certain things, precisely because we love and want to preserve certain other things.

We have gained a lot of enemies and lost a few friends. We grieve the loss of friends but will have no truck with the bizarre simulacrums of conservatism that have risen in recent years. We do not believe that Jews are responsible for any particular wickedness in the world. We do not believe that husbands should game their wives. We do not believe that vulgarity can stand in for effective polemics. We do not believe that non-whites are anything less than human, or, when American, anything less than American through and through. We reject the “science” of human differentiation by denigration.

The President who left office in January was, by comparison in personal life, twice the man of the current occupant of the White House. None of us voted for either of them.

The old verities still stand: the United States Constitution is a very fine document, eminently worthy of our admiration and obedience. The Preamble is a particularly brilliant summary. The First Amendment to that Constitution should govern our relations, civilly. The Second Amendment should govern our relations when civility fails. The Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments protect our liberties, and have been grievously violated by police and prosecutors across the country. The Tenth Amendment is a dead letter but nevertheless a superb statement on self-government to which we should all subscribe.

Private enterprise is a legitimate activity. It is the duty of government to secure property rights and only deprive men of the same by fair prosecution at law (even if you mouthed off to the cops.) Health is a gift not at right. Married couples should not be separated absent grievous and extraordinary circumstances. Only a man and a woman may marry.

St. Paul’s views on sexual ethics are sound. That people who affirm this have had their businesses and livelihood destroyed is a stain on our nation. Nevertheless, we Christians are to live peaceably with all. All sin should be renounced and repented of, in sincerity and contrition.

What we stood by in 2007 we stand by today, though the constellation of forces has changed. As Bob Dylan put it, we’re standing on the gallows with our head in the noose, but any minute now we’re expecting all hell to break loose.

—Paul Cella, for the Editors

Comments (6)

Appropriate song for the current global situation, in my opinion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJpfK7l404I

Thank you, Paul. I'm honored to be standing with you now as ten years ago.

I was impressed with the quality of the writing and of the thinking here 8 years ago when I first stumbled across this site. (Excluding my own posts), I am still impressed with it, and I think it compares favorably with just about ANY purveyor of religious and social commentary over the same period. Thank you, Paul and Lydia, thank you to all the contributors, and to our friends the commenters who have joined us in this extended conversation.

"We grieve the loss of friends but will have no truck with the bizarre simulacrums of conservatism that have risen in recent years. We do not believe that Jews are responsible for any particular wickedness in the world. We do not believe that husbands should game their wives. We do not believe that vulgarity can stand in for effective polemics. We do not believe that non-whites are anything less than human, or, when American, anything less than American through and through. We reject the “science” of human differentiation by denigration."

A concise statement perfectly calibrated to make the right people angry. Keep up the good work!

Wonderfully written.

I still think about the late Lawrence Auster from time to time. He was prescient about the maladies that affected Spencer and his ilk and would undoubtedly be grateful that he didn't live to see the rise of Trump's America.

Still I do get the feeling that cooler heads like ours will be forced to choose a side (both of whom are enemies). This reminds me of the struggles of the Ukrainian nationalists in the 40's; they hated Stalin because he tried to starve them all to death and they (eventually) hated Hitler because he also wanted to kill them. To the extent they are remembered at all, they are demonized by the Russians.

But I do not forget, and neither does God.

Still I do get the feeling that cooler heads like ours will be forced to choose a side (both of whom are enemies).

I won't do that.

Post a comment


Bold Italic Underline Quote

Note: In order to limit duplicate comments, please submit a comment only once. A comment may take a few minutes to appear beneath the article.

Although this site does not actively hold comments for moderation, some comments are automatically held by the blog system. For best results, limit the number of links (including links in your signature line to your own website) to under 3 per comment as all comments with a large number of links will be automatically held. If your comment is held for any reason, please be patient and an author or administrator will approve it. Do not resubmit the same comment as subsequent submissions of the same comment will be held as well.